PortalsOS

In 2009, a group of scientists published a study in the Open Chemical Physics Journal revealing that they found traces of explosive compounds in dust and debris samples collected shortly after the collapse of the World Trade Center Tower. This challenges the official narrative by suggesting the presence of explosive materials.

The collapse of Building 7 is completely unaddressed in the 9-11 Commission Report. Despite being a 47-story steel-frame high-rise, there is no explanation for why it fell, provoking questions and investigations for over two decades.

The removal of debris from Building 7 to Asia without examination hindered engineers' ability to analyze the collapse. This lack of evidence has fueled ongoing debates about the true cause of the building's fall.

Professor Leroy Hulsey of the University of Alaska at Fairbanks conducted an independent study, concluding that office fires could not have caused the thermal expansion needed to collapse Building 7. His findings challenge the official explanation and suggest a controlled demolition.

Despite the official narrative, video evidence shows Building 7 collapsing symmetrically at free fall acceleration, resembling a global collapse rather than a progressive one. This visual discrepancy raises doubts about the accepted explanation.

Barry Jennings, an eyewitness who reported hearing explosions inside Building 7, died unexpectedly at 53, just two days before the NIST report on Tower 7 was released. His account adds a layer of mystery to the events surrounding the building's collapse.