Vote to see vote counts
The NIST report concluded that using thermite for a controlled demolition of Building 7 would have been highly impractical. It would require thousands of pounds of thermite placed inconspicuously and ignited remotely, making it an unlikely method for the building's collapse.
Building 7 housed significant tenants like the New York City Office of Emergency Management and the United States Secret Service. Their records were destroyed when the building collapsed, raising questions about the nature of the tenants and the impact of the loss.
On the morning of 9-11, a group of five Israeli nationals purportedly witnessed the initial explosion of the World Trade Center and were seen celebrating the event. This incident received significant media coverage at the time.
The removal of debris from Building 7 to Asia without examination hindered engineers' ability to analyze the collapse. This lack of evidence has fueled ongoing debates about the true cause of the building's fall.
Professor Leroy Hulsey of the University of Alaska at Fairbanks conducted an independent study, concluding that office fires could not have caused the thermal expansion needed to collapse Building 7. His findings challenge the official explanation and suggest a controlled demolition.
Despite the official narrative, video evidence shows Building 7 collapsing symmetrically at free fall acceleration, resembling a global collapse rather than a progressive one. This visual discrepancy raises doubts about the accepted explanation.