PortalsOS

Related Posts

Vote to see vote counts

Podcast artwork
The Matt Walsh ShowEp. 1671 - It’s Time To Crush ...

The Insurrection Act could force federal judges to openly declare their rebellion against the executive branch, as it leaves no room for judges or lawmakers to intervene.

Podcast artwork
PivotJimmy Kimmel Returns, Charlie ...

The Trump administration's actions, such as targeting political enemies, are seen as undermining the rule of law.

Podcast artwork
The DailyThe Fight at the Center of the...

The Supreme Court blocked President Trump's efforts to remove Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve Board, affecting his plans to reshape the agency.

Podcast artwork
The DailyA Consequential Supreme Court ...

The Trump administration's agenda will dominate the Supreme Court docket, with cases on tariffs and presidential powers, including the authority to fire independent regulators and Federal Reserve governors.

Podcast artwork
The Young TurksJudge Obliterates Trump

The judge's decision included a critique of President Trump's disrespect for the United States Constitution, emphasizing that his actions represented an assault on the First Amendment.

Podcast artwork
Pod Save AmericaCan Democrats Win a Shutdown F...

The Trump administration's actions are seen as part of a broader strategy to intimidate and suppress political opposition through legal and extralegal means.

Podcast artwork
The DailyTrump Claims ‘Rebellion’ in Am...

District court judges are tasked with deciding the legality of the Trump administration's federalization of National Guard troops in cities like Portland and Chicago, balancing their rulings with maintaining public confidence.

Podcast artwork
Pod Save AmericaTrump Has James Comey Indicted

There is a concern that the rule of law is being undermined by the Trump administration's actions, which are perceived as politically motivated rather than based on legal merit.

Judge Immergut, a Trump appointee with strong conservative credentials, ruled against the administration, raising questions about claims of judicial bias.

The judge's ruling against Trump's administration highlights the importance of protecting constitutional rights for all individuals in the U.S., regardless of citizenship status.