PortalsOS

There is skepticism about the Trump administration's ceasefire deal between Hamas and Israel, with concerns about the sincerity of both parties involved.

The peace deal is perceived as a tactic by Netanyahu to justify continued military actions in Gaza by blaming Hamas for rejecting the deal.

There is skepticism about the sincerity of the peace deal, with concerns that it may be a strategy for Netanyahu to continue military operations under the guise of failed negotiations.

The ongoing conflict in Gaza raises questions about the real intentions behind peace deals and whether they are genuine or simply political maneuvers.

There is a prediction that even if Hamas releases hostages, Israel will break the ceasefire deal, citing non-compliance from Hamas as justification.

The peace deal is perceived as a way for Netanyahu to justify continued military actions in Gaza under the guise of responding to Hamas's refusal.

Despite a ceasefire and the release of 20 hostages, the situation between Israel and Hamas isn't resolved. Donald Trump's claim of solving eight wars, including this one, is seen as fraudulent since the core issues remain unaddressed.

The real question then was, what is Netanyahu going to do? During these sessions, Netanyahu repeatedly tries to massage language of some of the proposals that would reduce Israel's commitments and also to create loopholes that might make it appear that Hamas was violating the deal.

The peace deal's feasibility is questioned due to the lack of a clear mechanism to ensure Hamas's surrender and the Israeli government's unwillingness to withdraw from Gaza.

There's a fear that if any harm comes to American troops, Israel might blame the Palestinians, regardless of the truth, to justify further military action. This distrust stems from a history of misinformation.