Vote to see vote counts
Eukaryotes are significant because they represent a singularity in the history of life on Earth, arising once about 2 billion years ago. This event gave rise to all complex life, despite bacteria and archaea having a greater genetic repertoire.
Eukaryotes have larger genomes because they acquired mitochondria, which provided more energy to support larger genetic material. This energy availability allows for systematic gene maintenance, unlike bacteria that rely on lateral gene transfer.
Bacterial evolution is fascinating because they maintain small genomes but have access to a large pan genome. For example, an E. coli cell might have 3,000 to 4,000 genes but access to 30,000 to 40,000 genes. This allows them to adapt by borrowing genes from other strains, which is crucial for survival in different environments.
The necessity of large genomes in multicellular organisms is driven by the need to minimize genetic conflict between cells, ensuring that all cells work towards the same goal of survival and reproduction.
Nick Lane contrasts sexual reproduction with lateral gene transfer in bacteria, explaining that bacteria often pick up random DNA from their environment when stressed. This process allows for rapid adaptation but lacks the systematic gene pooling seen in sexual reproduction.
The emergence of eukaryotes is seen as a major bottleneck in the development of complex life. Despite the vast number of planets that could potentially give rise to eukaryotes, it seems this event is incredibly rare, with Earth being a unique example.
Despite the vast number of planets, the unique development of eukaryotes on Earth suggests that while other methods of achieving complexity might exist, they are not easily realized in nature.