Vote to see vote counts
The only way you can get on board with it is you have to essentially go like pure Machiavellian. You know, here's the argument. If you've committed X amount of felonies, you have to leave the country.
If the rioters don't get arrested, but anyone who resists the rioters does, it tells you that the rioters are, in effect, working for the state. They're the militia then. Right?
We're spending $100,000 per person deported. If we simply fined that 79-year-old car wash owner $10,000 every time he hires an illegal alien, this would stop. There are much better ways to execute this.
In the upcoming elections, we might see soldiers or people dressed as soldiers at polling places under the guise of protecting voting rights, which could intimidate voters.
Ballot harvesting and lack of voter ID checks in California may hinder outsiders from being elected.
The Department of Justice's demand for voter data from all states raises questions about their intentions, especially given the lack of transparency and the minimal evidence of voter fraud.
The practice of moving immigrants to swing states and providing them with benefits is seen as an attempt to manipulate elections, though it ultimately didn't succeed.
The deployment of federalized guardsmen is seen as a means to intimidate communities and retaliate against political opponents, rather than addressing crime.
If you were to ask me, what is the thing you could do to help men the most in the U.S., I would point to criminal justice reform because they're disproportionately affected by the criminal justice system.
It's legal to protest under the First Amendment. Civil disobedience isn't a crime, but it can lead to illegal conduct. Hoyt's suggestion to put spikes on vehicles to run over protesters is extreme.