PortalsOS

Public relations mattered to Hamas because they couldn't win on the battlefield. They believed they could win in the court of public opinion and pressure Israel to concede.

The peace deal is perceived as a tactic by Netanyahu to justify continued military actions in Gaza by blaming Hamas for rejecting the deal.

There is skepticism about the sincerity of the peace deal, with concerns that it may be a strategy for Netanyahu to continue military operations under the guise of failed negotiations.

Criticism of Israel is often silenced by accusations of anti-Semitism, preventing honest geopolitical discussions.

The moral clarity in understanding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been lost by some. The Israelis showed tremendous restraint in warfare, despite the sadism of Hamas terrorists.

The peace deal's failure is attributed to Israel's refusal to abide by its terms, despite public claims of acceptance.

The peace deal is perceived as a way for Netanyahu to justify continued military actions in Gaza under the guise of responding to Hamas's refusal.

The peace deal is seen as a way to expose Israel's true intentions, as they are unlikely to honor the agreement.

The end of the war leaves critics of Israel without the narrative of Jewish power and control, forcing them to shift focus to other aspects of perceived Jewish influence.

There is a perception that the media often portrays Palestinians negatively in peace deal negotiations, without fully exploring the terms offered to them.