PortalsOS

The ongoing conflict in Gaza raises questions about the real intentions behind peace deals and whether they are genuine or simply political maneuvers.

Donald Trump was asked about a two-state solution and responded, 'I don't have a view. I'm gonna go with what they agreed to.' This lack of a clear stance on such a critical issue raises concerns about his understanding and commitment to Middle East peace.

Hamas must be expelled from any leadership position to prevent future conflicts. It's a red line for Israel, and we must help enforce it to avoid civilian suffering again.

Some of the thorniest issues are still on the table. They haven't been worked out yet. For instance, what exactly is the requirement for Hamas to lay down its weapons? What is the future of rebuilding Gaza?

The international community must stop enabling Israel's worst instincts by providing unchecked support. A balanced approach is needed to ensure both Israeli and Palestinian safety and freedom, advocating for a return to 1967 borders and a two-state solution.

Despite the positive atmosphere, difficult talks lie ahead regarding Gaza's post-war governance, Hamas's future, and the potential for Palestinian statehood, with a 20-point plan allowing for eventual possibilities but only after a long series of preconditions are met.

Donald Trump, when asked about a two-state solution, avoided a direct response and instead focused on a 20-point plan that he has altered with both Israel and Arab countries. This reflects a lack of clear direction.

Donald Trump's response to the two-state solution question was evasive, stating he would go with what they agree to, raising concerns about his understanding of the peace process.