PortalsOS

Federal judges have been blocking significant decisions by the Trump administration, effectively acting as if they are the president. This unsustainable situation has led commentators to suggest the White House ignore these rulings.

The judge dedicated more than a dozen pages to addressing Trump's disrespect for the U.S. Constitution, calling it a full-throated assault on the First Amendment.

The judge's decision included a critique of President Trump's disrespect for the United States Constitution, emphasizing that his actions represented an assault on the First Amendment.

A federal judge blocked Donald Trump's attempt to deploy 300 California National Guard troops to Oregon, ruling it unlawful.

The Trump administration's actions in Portland and other cities have sparked protests and legal challenges, with local leaders arguing against federal intervention.

District court judges are tasked with deciding the legality of the Trump administration's federalization of National Guard troops in cities like Portland and Chicago, balancing their rulings with maintaining public confidence.

A Reagan-appointed federal judge criticized President Donald Trump for his administration's actions against pro-Palestinian protesters, stating that they unlawfully chilled protected political speech.

There is a concern that the rule of law is being undermined by the Trump administration's actions, which are perceived as politically motivated rather than based on legal merit.

The judge dedicated a significant portion of his ruling to address Trump's disrespect for the Constitution, highlighting a full-throated assault on the First Amendment.

The judge's ruling against Trump's administration highlights the importance of protecting constitutional rights for all individuals in the U.S., regardless of citizenship status.