PortalsOS

Brock confirms beneath that video on X that burning a flag is protected speech in this country, saying flag burning in the U.S. is a constitutionally protected First Amendment right over which the president has no authority. The issue has been litigated numerous times throughout history, culminating in the landmark Supreme Court case Johnson in 1989.

The judge argued that the Trump administration's actions represented a full-throated assault on the First Amendment, violating the constitutional rights of non-citizens in the U.S.

The judge dedicated more than a dozen pages to addressing Trump's disrespect for the U.S. Constitution, calling it a full-throated assault on the First Amendment.

The judge's decision emphasized that Trump's actions represented an assault on the First Amendment and violated the presidential oath to preserve the Constitution.

The judge's decision included a critique of President Trump's disrespect for the United States Constitution, emphasizing that his actions represented an assault on the First Amendment.

The Trump administration's actions, such as threatening broadcasters, are seen as a serious threat to free speech in the United States.

Trump said in the first clip we showed you in this segment, we're going to take freedom of speech away. Let me go to a couple of clips from, here's one from 2002. Let's see if Trump was consistent. If we don't have free speech, then we just don't have a free country. It's as simple as that.

Eric Trump comments on the lawfare against his family, particularly criticizing James Comey and Tish James. He argues that the legal actions were unjust, citing overturned decisions and the financial penalties imposed on them as examples of a 'make-believe land' scenario.

The judge dedicated a significant portion of his ruling to address Trump's disrespect for the Constitution, highlighting a full-throated assault on the First Amendment.

The whole point of freedom of speech is to say unpopular things, right? But even if you were to say, okay, look, I don't think it's freedom of speech to burn a flag, even if the Supreme Court disagrees, even if the Constitution disagrees.